CAFA QOD: The Art of Failure
Posted by: admin in CAFA QOD, Artist stereotypes, Artistic self-destruction, Artist quote, Chuck Connelly, The excesses of artists, Artists are their own worst enemies, Aging artists, The struggles of artists, Artistic delusion, The tortured artist, Artistic failure in America“…Tell your wife you love her. This is what it’s all about. Otherwise, you’ll be painting and looking at pictures like this. Your days are numbered, clowns. This is the end of the line. The end of beauty. The end of hope. What is art anyway? Decorations for museums.”
–Chuck Connelly, in the extra features on the DVD for The Art of Failure: Chuck Connelly Not for Sale, A Film by Jeff Stimmel
I realized about halfway through Jeff Stimmel’s 2008 documentary about Chuck Connelly that I had met this person before, several times. I’d heard his rants before, I’d seen his behavior, I’d witnessed in person how he lived. Through my years as a writer on art, I interviewed and wrote about a number of aging artists — perhaps 6 or 7 in sum — who were very similar to the way Connelly portrays himself in the film. They were so much alike, in fact, that it seems there must be a personality type: The Delusional Shut-in Artist, perhaps, or maybe the Quixotic Quack Painter.
Here are some of the character features of these men (all the ones I’ve met are men):
They are painters, most often.
They have a heroic vision of themselves (as a Great Artist, a warrior fighting against the cultural tides, a man on a holy quest for beauty, truth, etc).
They are so focused on their art — their quest — that not much else matters to them.
As a rule, they don’t care much about their appearance, and they often let themselves go.
They live in a kind of contained squalor, most often surrounded by the messy trappings of their art practice and the accumulated junk piles of the congenital shut-in.
They tend to believe that they’ve been cheated, somehow, out of the rewards (fame, wealth, attention) they feel is rightfully theirs.
They are misogynistic, abusive to their loved ones, and generally fail at interpersonal relationships.
Evenso, they can be very charismatic, attracting a succession of short-term acolytes, supporters, and co-dependents who eventually end up fleeing in disgust from being used.
They tend toward substance abuse.
They are verbally brilliant, though they think and speak in non-linear, associative ways.
They exhibit flashes of brilliance and great command of their own self-directed learning, but they tend to be, at best, emotionally adolescent.
Entries (RSS)
June 22nd, 2009 at 8:18 pm
funny, you’ve basically outlined the DSM criteria for diagnosing narcissistic personality disorder…
July 25th, 2009 at 9:46 am
True that there are artists like this. Also true that sometimes they do wonderful work (certainly not always). The quality of the human doing the work is not an index of the quality of the work. Also, pathologizing oddity troubles me. I mean, in my life I have come to see consciousness itself as a kind of pathology, I suppose–and messy unpleasantness can seem less pathological to me than some other manifestations of the human. Human beings are ridden by all kinds of gods and demons, filled with force and mystery. Sometimes they are broken by it, or at least cracked.
October 29th, 2009 at 8:50 am
sounds like a typical sulfur type to me…
January 31st, 2010 at 7:37 pm
If a person would have to be crazy to be a professional painter, then doesn’ it follow that their behavior is normal for painters? The problem of faulty reasoning appears when we use our middle class working slave (i e. the expert white middle class male psychologist) definitions on a different breed of cat.