I promise to post new material to CAFA very soon (once funeral fallout has settled, grant deadlines have passed, and life falls back into its regular pattern), but in the meantime here’s an updated version of the material I linked to in my previous post.

The reason I reposted this piece, and the reason I’m resubmitting it here, is I added more thoughts at the end based on events that occurred on September 15. By this I mean, in particular, “…the country’s continued and deepening economic decline and slide into oblivion; its inexplicable and pathetic fascination with Sarah Palin; its continued and maddening political gullibility; and the suicide of David Foster Wallace, who once, appropriately enough, observed in his essay ‘Consider the Lobster’: ‘After all the abstract intellection, there remain the facts of the frantically clanking lid, the pathetic clinging to the edge of the pot. Standing at the stove, it is hard to deny in any meaningful way that this is a living creature experiencing pain and wishing to avoid/escape the painful experience.’”

 If you’re lazy (like me!) and just want to read the new material, here it is, block-quoted:

AFTERWARD: SEPTEMBER 15, 2008: So it took ten long years—after giving it all I had to give—for me to fail in art. And while there are lot of platitudes that I could spout off here—about what one should do when given a bowl full of lemons, about what one should do if at first one doesn’t succeed, etc.—let’s be realistic for a moment. On July 15, 2008, I learned, plain and simple, that my expectations for art will never be met, that I will never be quite the success in art I hoped to be, that the arts community will never rise to the levels that I dreamed for it, and that I am lucky to have escaped.

I could point out that it took twenty wasted years, after graduating from college with a hopeful degree in art, for me to understand that a life in art is a doomed life, but I won’t dwell on this. Instead I’ll point out I’m not particularly unique in realizing the nature of the art world. The great German painter Gerhard Richter, for instance, said as much when he proclaimed: “Art is always to a large extent about need, despair and hopelessness.” The great American painter Jasper Johns said, about his early career as an artist: “I assumed that everything would lead to complete failure, but I decided that didn’t matter—that would be my life.” The American realist painter William Bailey said: “…Frankly, I believe that every painter is in a state of continual failure. The only constant in a painter’s life is failure.”

Now, in mid-September, two month after my grim nadir and a few weeks after the debacle of the lipsticked Pit Bull, while the days retract, gardens dry up, and a wan chill fills the air, I look back at all the drama and despair of the end of my arts career, and I am happy I am still able to breathe. I say this full knowing that the economic and cultural woes have only deepened since July 15. Lehman Brothers has tanked; Merrill Lynch has been bought up (even after nearly 100 years of independent operation); the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped on his day by nearly 500 points (the sixth highest amount in history); and David Foster Wallace committed suicide after battling with deepening depression (ironically enough while living the hometown of my brother, where I had just happened to be visiting at the time because of the death, at age 84, of my grandmother).

Yet despite the ever-darkening clouds outside my existential cabin, I am placid now, after having removed myself from the turmoil of a life in the arts. I’ve started a new, more sane, less soul-sucking, job, and I’m quietly, after two years and two months of dismay, coming to terms with my potentially misspent artistic life. If I had been, back on July 15, more level-headed and more prone to thinking for the long-term, I might have realized that—despite the individual failures of thousands of young people like me, despite the constant struggle and eventual capitulation of all of us in the arts, despite the endless climb against the raging current—it doesn’t matter really. Art goes on. Art survives and continues to be made, usually by the next generation who, in their energetic ignorance, relives the failure over and over again. Over the long term, individuals like me matter little in the face of the painful human compulsion to realize beauty from the labors of the hand.

If I were more resilient and long-suffering, or perhaps more talented or more cutthroat, all I’d have had to do is wait until these things that are ruinous to us now—in the culture, and in the art world—had passed, and we’d moved on to a more optimistic and hopeful time. Some of my more long-suffering artist friends have already spoken such words to me since July 15, the worry-lines of resignation on their faces giving lie to their optimistic words: “Music always gets made,” one said to me, “and it’s up to us—each of us—to come to the music.” Those who walk away from the music, he seemed to be saying, aren’t worth worrying about.

Maybe, I nod outwardly. But inside I can’t help but wonder if there isn’t an end time looming in the arts. Yes, people will continue coming to the art in their way, sticking with it or not on their own terms, finding their own equations for success and failure, and all will abide. But I wonder just how many more of these smart and capable young people who become fascinated by, and fall in love with, art—against their better judgment—have to ruin their life because of it. How many of us will continue to fall in love with such a life partner, passing twenty rocky years with her until we find out she’s been unfaithful since the beginning? Yes, maybe the music will go on no matter who is there to make it. But will the music have the resonance and beauty it’d’ve had if the culture had somehow agreed to make at least a minimal commitment of energy to it?

Truth is, there’s just no good way to spin a post-July 15 world. The only solace, perhaps, are words by the Irish critic and poet Edward Dowden, who said, “Sometimes a noble failure serves the world as faithfully as a distinguished success.” Perhaps July 15, 2008, simply had to happen so I, and perhaps you, could at last look at the artless world with new, and clearer, eyes, and realize that failure just is our lot in the arts. It’s just the way it is.

And while it’s sad that a person who’s dedicated so much time to art should be so bitterly resigned to failure now, perhaps this need not be a tragedy. Perhaps, in fact, this is a liberation and a blessing, a full license for me to investigate a number of new questions about art. Instead of wondering how I can survive the next week as an artist, I now can ask, with deep intention, why can’t the life of artists be better in this country? Instead of worrying about my next opportunity to exhibit or be on display, I can chronicle of the various aspects of failure in the arts in our time—with the view of someone who’s seen it and lived it—and expose the unaware to the depths of the problems faced by artists in America. I can take pause and wonder why can’t the beauty made of artists’ hands become a more integral part of the everyday life of Americans? Why aren’t we all working together—all of us, in all corners of the country—to prop up the arts and make our land more rich with beauty, with artistic ideas, with the well-crafted trappings of an elegant life? I can wonder exactly what it means that we’ve created a culture so antithetical to all the things that art stands for.

And so, with my hard-earned awareness of the precarious nature of a life in the arts I am driven now to seek potential answers about why, if art is doomed to failure, are we living creatures so attracted to its pain.

6 Responses to “The Day the Music Died, Redux”

  1. Gabe Combs says:

    i rather enjoyed the history of the article. i found it funny reading it just after posting a middle finger post to the summer shakeups thread. you sir, are a motivator in some sense. i make more art as the art world locally lets me down, not less. one local artist that is doing ok told me, about at year ago, “if i don’t make it by the time i’m thirty, i’m quitting art and doing something else” this is the fundamental problem with art currently, is that the business/career is taking the drivers seat, and the true art is being kicked to the curb by the incestual cluster fuck of maggots that eat everything and feed nothing but themselves. i wish it were just bitterness, or even some sort of hate that motivated these thoughts in me, but even in the face of the economical crisis, fashion is “in”. culture and art that moves me are dwindling. hopefully this economic problem will weed out some folks, but who knows. i don’t have time to watch it, as i must make art for 18 hours a day. not sure how motivated i even am to see the forums until their inevitable death. bontecou had the right idea, just walk away. or, to reference your post here, “not. another. word…”

  2. louis allgeyer says:

    There does seem to be a bit of luck involved in being a market-place only artist, Damian Hist, Matt Barney, etc. How they get traction is a mystery but it all seems to be about networking. Otherwise one digs ones grave teaching & chasing grants.

    But is what Hist & Barney & etc doing art or entertainment? Maybe both as the term “artist” is so loosely thrown about. You’ve got your recording artist and your escape artist and your screen artist. And now your multi-media artist.

    Art as a term is so freighted with cultural baggage and art historians & curator people keep it that way to keep their jobs. Much the way MOMA keeps trotting out Jackson Pollack to keep up the value of their holdings. Really, “art” is interior decoration that by the passage of time becomes a window to many facets of historic time in some future time. Time is the catalist, not media hype.

    I think, maybe.

    Keep painting.

  3. Richard Stryker says:

    Okay. Pick yourself up. Dust yourself off. And, get yourself back in the game. There is no failure. It’s the third inning, for Pete’s sake. Try a new bat. Adjust your swing a little bit. I know it hurts when you get hit by a pitch. Okay, okay, I don’t like baseball either. It’s boring. But, you like ART. So, you have to constantly negotiate with your doubts. And, remember it’s just the third inning.

  4. admin says:

    After twenty years I’ve only made it to the third inning? Jeez, what a long game this is turning out to be…
    I personally like baseball. Enough to know there’s another cliché that fits here: “We’ll get ‘em next year!”
    That is, I’ve made my peace now with having to leave such a godawful job–the culmination of all my work and skill-gathering and experience–and going off into the off-season. There are no worries now. I’ve got a calm new job that’s going well, I’m still writing about art, I’m much better off than I was. I’ve even started hatching new off-season plans and schemes for art, thinking maybe I’ll even build myself a new studio and start making some art myself again.
    “I’ll get ‘em next year!”

  5. bob schulz says:

    Isn’t desiring, purchasing and hanging a painting on a wall in a private home also entertainment? If I’m correct, isn’t pleasure one of the reasons paintings are purchased? Or for that matter, viewed in a museum?

    Entertainment is a good thing? No? Lifts the spirit, raises the gaze, fills the mind with dopamine in extreme cases, and can vex the mind forever with the thought, “why the hell did I buy this thing that I can’t stop looking at?”

  6. louis allgeyer says:

    9.25.08

    michael kimmel, today, in the new york times arts page says it is all due to the post war artists who were over exposed to abstract expressioninm being now displaced by the children of the boomers, who werren’t.

Leave a Reply